Archives

This is iamkevin4life

Listen you dumb douche this is the side account of Iamkevin4life (talk · contribs · block log). I demand you unblock me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamkevin4life2 (talk • contribs) 00:35, September 1, 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but no. If you believe that block is unjustified you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} to your talk page at User talk:Iamkevin4life. Thanks. — Satori Son 20:19, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Citations missing

Template:Citations missing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — SMcCandlish talk cont ‹(-¿-)› 01:17, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

I got information

i got information so i think it is appropiate to edit —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cperea1994 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

I honestly have no idea what you are talking about. What is this in reference to? — Satori Son 15:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

PARARUBBAS maybe?

Hi there SATORI, VASCO here,

I am back, still editing from time to time, although i frequently edit with this old anonymous account (no advantages, considering my edit approach, to be registered).

Just to let you know that user 92.3.217.16 (talk · contribs) (see for instance this article - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jo%C3%A3o_Tom%C3%A1s) could VERY WELL be PARARUBBAS "in disguise". No external links removed, at least some examples (i have already checked his edit history), but he keeps GLUING SENTENCES!

Always nice to wikisee you,

FROM PORTUGAL, all the best - --217.129.67.28 (talk) 17:06, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, Vasco. Since this IP hasn't edited for over a month, I suspect it probably was him but now his IP has changed again. Please let me know if you see him active again and I'll try to help keep an eye on things. Best, Satori Son 18:48, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

My ears are burning...

I'm wondering if I could get your advice, since you've interacted with one of the concerned parties. I noticed that no fewer than three recently joined users are talking about me, specifically regarding my edits at 5W Public Relations: here,here, and here. It's weird enough that I'm talked about on such a minor article, even weirder that they seem so authoritative after just a handful of edits.

Now, I realize that WP:AGF is there for a good reason, but I can't help but notice the similarities in their arguments for questioning and undoing my edits. There is also a similarity in tone to the accounts mentioned I have clashed with over this article (see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Emetman), and I'm reminded of an edit where User:Judae1 (an exec with the firm and the creator of the 5W article) tried to "out" me as one of his commercial rivals during a contentious deletion debate. My question is, are my suspicions enough for me to request any type of Admin action (say, checkuser or sockpuppet inquiry), or should I leave it alone? Thanks. Mosmof (talk) 22:13, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

My personal opinion is that due to the editing patterns and single-purpose nature of the accounts, a new checkuser request is warranted. Obviously, using sock- and meatpuppets to give the appearance of consensus would not be acceptable.

I will update the request at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Emetman and see what they say. — Satori Son 12:39, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. I've added Judae1 to the checkuser list, since I found it incredibly odd that his name came up when I haven't interacted with him in years, and I've seen a similarity in tone between him and the SPAs. Cheers. --Mosmof (talk) 15:38, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

HELP!!!

Hi there SATORI, VASCO here,

Unfortunately, these things keep happening, after all one's hard work: There are 2 JOSE LLUIS MARTI (MALLORCA footballer). In one, the good, i improved/created storyline, added refs, links, the whole stuff (here is his piece: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jose_Luis_Marti).

In the other, THE BAD...nevermind man, here it is too (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_Luis_Mart%C3%AD_Soler), you can compare both and choose which one to remove...I strongly recommend you remove the second, LOL!

Best regards, VASCO AMARAL - --217.129.67.28 (talk) 03:13, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to jump in here, but there was a simple fix so I decided to be WP:BOLD and made the change. Since José Luis Martí is more complete and has a longer edit history, I ended up making José Luis Martí Soler a redirect to the older article. I hope this resolves everything. --Mosmof (talk) 15:31, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks very much! — Satori Son 12:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

SATORI my man, just one more thing:

If you decide to remove the more complete storyline of the better more complete example, in the player stated above (MARTÍ) could you please send its text to me, so that i can glue it in the remaining version?

Many thanks (again) in advance,

VASCO AMARAL - --217.129.67.28 (talk) 14:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Just to tell you that, regarding the other two requests i made previously, all is superbly taken care of, courtesy of user http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mosmof, as you can clearly see on your talk page.

I have already directed the proper thanks and bows that the man duly deserves, nice teamwork!!

From PORTUGAL, as always saying "cheers",

VASCO AMARAL - --217.129.67.28 (talk) 19:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Sorry I was away. My travel schedule has been just crazy lately, so I might not always be around. Very glad that Mosmof was here to lend a hand. — Satori Son 12:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

User:Karmaisking - now editing as User:$laveryWorldwideInc

Obvious here: [1].--Gregalton (talk) 10:23, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

And blocked. — Satori Son 17:40, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi

You might be interested in the discussion here. Exploding Boy (talk) 18:23, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Already on top of it - thanks. — Satori Son 18:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Unblock request

Hey Stifle. Hope all is well with you. Gregalton, a user I have had good dealings with, has requested an unblock, and I am inclined to agree with him. The situation is very complicated, and I have tried my best to summarize it at WP:ANI#Sockpuppetry and POV-pushing on Austrian School and related topics. (As you can see, Greg's 3RR block was not my main reason for posting there.) Your comments and consideration would be appreciated. Thanks. — Satori Son 21:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm going to reply at the ANI thread. Stifle (talk) 21:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Great. Hopefully I made sense of this mess. Thanks again. — Satori Son 21:37, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Edit conflicts on ANI

Hi, there is already a thread Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Board messed up SOME SECTIONS CORRUPTED so please can an admin notice this and help? about the edit conflicts, the problem arose here [2] and someone needs to reinsert the lost edits. I can't do it, as I get to many edit conflicts when I try. An admin needs to protect the page and do the required, then unprotect. DuncanHill (talk) 22:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

It's OK, it's been fixed now, till the next time! DuncanHill (talk) 22:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I was away from the computer for a while. Wow, what a mess. Thanks for your help with all that. — Satori Son 02:02, 8 September 2008 (UTC)